Disclosure: We may earn affiliate commissions if you sign up through our links. This does not influence our evaluations.
At a glance - Roobet Partners vs Stake.com
| Feature | Roobet Partners | Stake.com |
|---|---|---|
| License | Curacao | Curacao |
| Welcome bonus | No standard bonus available¹ | No standard bonus available¹ |
| Affiliate revshare | Up to 70% | Up to 45% |
| Negative carryover | No | No |
| Crypto methods count | 3 (BTC, ETH, LTC) | 6 (BTC, ETH, LTC, DOGE, BCH, XRP) |
| Accepts fiat | No | No |
| Sportsbook | No | No |
| Provably fair | No | No |
| Withdrawal speed (tested) | NOT YET TESTED² | NOT YET TESTED² |
¹ At the time of writing, neither platform offers a publicly advertised welcome deposit bonus based on the data supplied to us. ² Our team has not independently verified withdrawal processing times. The “NOT YET TESTED” status applies to both operators.
Roobet Partners - Strengths and weaknesses
Roobet Partners is the official affiliate programme behind Roobet, a crypto-only casino that has carved out a niche among streamers and high-energy gambling communities. The standout feature for anyone promoting the brand is the 70% revenue share deal - almost double what many competitors offer - and the guarantee of no negative carryover. That means an unlucky month where a referred player hits a massive win won’t eat into future commissions. For affiliates who live or die by revshare percentages, Roobet’s structure is exceptionally attractive.
On the player side, the casino itself runs on a restricted but functional set of cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin. Fiat deposits are not supported, so the entire experience is built around crypto users. The game library is decent, although our data does not include exact provider counts. One noticeable gap - and this is a direct reflection of the information we were given - is that Roobet Partners does not list any provably fair system. Whether that’s because the operator hasn’t implemented the technology or simply doesn’t advertise it, we cannot say; we must take the provided data at face value.
The absence of a sportsbook also limits cross-selling opportunities for affiliates. Without a sportsbook, you can only refer casino (and potentially live casino) players. Withdrawal speed, a crucial factor for player retention, is another unknown. We have not tested Roobet’s cash-out process, so we can’t deliver a verified number on how many minutes or hours a payout takes. Anecdotal community reports suggest it is competitive, but until our own team completes a controlled withdrawal, we won’t put a figure on it.
For affiliates, the 70% commission is the headline, but it’s worth remembering that the brand’s recognition is still growing. Roobet has a smaller global footprint than the industry leader it’s often compared to, which can mean lower initial traffic but also less saturation among affiliate marketers. The lack of fiat rails also narrows the potential audience, especially in regions where buying crypto still feels like a hurdle.
In short, Roobet Partners shines for commission-hungry affiliates who can drive high-quality crypto traffic, but the platform’s cryptocurrency selection is thin, there’s no provably fair badge (per our review data), and key operational numbers like withdrawal speed remain untested by our team.
Stake.com - Strengths and weaknesses
Stake.com needs little introduction. Even without a sportsbook (according to the data we were given for this comparison), it remains one of the most recognised crypto gambling brands on the planet. Its affiliate programme operates on a 45% revenue share with no negative carryover, which, while lower than Roobet’s headline figure, is still highly competitive - especially when you factor in the sheer volume of players Stake sees every day.
The cryptocurrency support is a clear strength: six coins (BTC, ETH, LTC, DOGE, BCH, XRP) versus Roobet’s three. That wider net catches players who prefer faster, cheaper chains like Litecoin or Dogecoin, or those who hold XRP. Again, fiat is not accepted, so the user base remains crypto-native. The game library, while not quantified in our data, is understood to be vast, with thousands of slots, table games, and live dealer tables from top-tier providers.
However, some of the information supplied to us for this comparison raises eyebrows. The data explicitly states that Stake.com has no sportsbook and no provably fair system. That may seem contradictory to what many players believe - Stake is famously known for its provably fair originals and a huge sports betting section. But for the purpose of this head-to-head, we must stick to the figures we were handed. If those features are indeed missing, it drastically changes the value proposition. We recommend readers verify Sportsbook availability directly, as our data does not align with public perception.
On the withdrawal front, we face the same gap: we have not tested Stake’s payout speed ourselves. The operator enjoys a strong reputation for near-instant crypto withdrawals, but until our own verification is complete, we can’t publish a confirmed timeframe. This is critical because many review sites quote unverified numbers as fact - we refuse to do that.
Affiliates will find Stake’s programme mature, with reliable tracking and a massive pool of existing player awareness. The 45% revshare may not be the highest, but the brand’s conversion rate often compensates. The trade-off is clear: less commission per player, but potentially far more players to earn from.
For the end user, Stake’s broader crypto menu and established VIP programme (rake-back, level-up bonuses) are genuine advantages. The lack of a welcome bonus, as noted, doesn’t hurt it against Roobet, since neither offers one. Ultimately, Stake’s strength lies in its scale and crypto diversity, though the contradictions in our data set - particularly around the sportsbook and provably fair status - are something we want to flag openly.
Head-to-head on bonuses
Both Roobet and Stake land in the same boat: no traditional welcome deposit bonus was available at the time of this review. No 100% match, no free spins package, no risk-free bet. This may come as a shock to players accustomed to wall-to-wall bonus offers from fiat casinos, but it is increasingly common in the crypto-gambling space, where operators rely on rake-back, VIP perks, and in-house challenges instead. Because neither platform provides a bonus that we can compare, this round is a dead heat - and a disappointing one at that. If a flashy welcome offer is a dealbreaker for you, both will leave you wanting. Players might find occasional promotions or social-media giveaways, but nothing structured that we could benchmark. The takeaway: bonuses are not a reason to choose one over the other.
Head-to-head on payments + withdrawal
Crypto-only operations make the payments comparison simple but lopsided. Stake.com supports six coins (BTC, ETH, LTC, DOGE, BCH, XRP), while Roobet supports three (BTC, ETH, LTC). That’s double the deposit and withdrawal flexibility on Stake, giving players more options to avoid network congestion or high fees. Neither brand accepts fiat via bank transfer or credit card, so you’ll need to arrive with crypto in a personal wallet.
The elephant in the room is withdrawal speed. Both are marked as “NOT YET TESTED” by our team. We have not submitted a withdrawal request, recorded the confirmation time, and verified the funds in an external wallet. Reputation suggests Stake processes payouts swiftly (often in under 10 minutes), and Roobet isn’t known for delays, but without our own data we can’t draw a definitive conclusion. If a few extra coins matter to you, Stake is the clear winner; if not, the payment experience will be comparable. But anyone telling you an exact minute figure for either casino right now is guessing, and we won’t do that.
Verdict: who wins and for which player
- For the low-roller: Stake.com pulls ahead. The wider choice of cryptocurrencies, especially DOGE and LTC, allows tiny, low-fee bets that suit a cautious budget. Roobet’s three-coin limitation feels restrictive by comparison.
- For the high-roller: Stake again. Its VIP programme (levels, rakeback, reloads) is well-documented by the community, and the brand’s liquidity means high-limit bets are rarely an issue. Roobet can handle big action, but Stake’s reputation for high-stakes play is stronger.
- For the US player: Neither platform is a clear winner. Both hold Curacao licences and are known to geo-restrict American users. If you’re in the US, you’ll likely face a block on the main sites.
- For the EU player: Stake.com gives more overall value - more coins, a bigger game library, and an established VIP ladder. Roobet is a solid alternative, but Stake edges it.
- For the slots-only player: On raw data, both offer slots, but Stake’s greater market presence usually means a larger and fresher provider catalogue. We can’t verify counts, but the balance tilts toward Stake.
- For the sports bettor: This is where our conclusion will raise eyebrows. According to the information supplied to us, neither Roobet nor Stake has a sportsbook. If that data is accurate, sports bettors should look elsewhere immediately. However, given Stake’s widely advertised sports offering, we strongly suspect a discrepancy in the dataset. We recommend checking the site directly before ruling it out, but for the purpose of this comparison we can only report what we were given - and on paper, both fail the sports test.
- For the affiliate: Roobet Partners is the undisputed winner. The 70% revenue share with no negative carryover is a monster deal, and the brand still has room to grow in less saturated markets. Stake’s 45% is fair, but if your main concern is commission percentage, Roobet is the better pick.
Overall player verdict: Stake.com takes the crown for most gamblers thanks to its crypto diversity, VIP structure, and established trust. Roobet is a worthy runner-up, especially if you value a fresh, streamer-friendly vibe, but it can’t match Stake’s breadth.
Overall affiliate verdict: Roobet Partners’ 70% deal is too good to ignore. Affiliates who can push targeted crypto traffic will likely earn more per head here than with Stake.